After doing some more testing I've found a test case where this patch breaks. I though it was a bit too simple to be true.
I'll follow the gcc thread, hopefully I'll be able to learn how it should be done. Regards Phil. Dima wrote: > Thanks, Phil. > This will be done a bit later with a proper fix which counts bit more things > around shift. > I started a thread in gcc list where possible fix will be discussed. > ~d
