I looked at your header file and noticed you had a hard time finding a
macro to use to identify CCE.  You can use the macro
__TI_COMPILER_VERSION to detect the TI code generation tools in general.

___________________________________________
 
Chris Recoskie
Software Designer
Texas Instruments, Toronto
http://eclipse.org/cdt
 
 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mspgcc-users-ad...@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:mspgcc-users-
> ad...@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Steve Underwood
> Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 9:35 AM
> To: mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Mspgcc-users] compiler-independent ISR declarations
> 
> Hi Rolf,
> 
> Excellent idea. However your version seems incomplete. The attached
file
> tries to work with MSPGCC, Quadravox, IAR 1-3, Rowley, and CCE. I
tried
> it briefly (not thoroughly) with MSPGCC, Quadravox, IAR 3.x, and CCE.
It
> seems to work OK.
> 
> I'd like to get this tested and into CVS when it has been reviewed a
> little. I need to write code that is built with multiple compilers,
and
> the ISR definitions have been annoying me for a while. Your posting
> prompted me to finally address the issue.
> 
> Regards,
> Steve
> 
> nobo...@web.de wrote:
> 
> >Hi,
> >
> >i made macros for compiler-independent ISR declarations to have a C
code
> >which can be compiled with mspgcc, IAR V1 and crossworks:
> >
> >http://random.linux-site.net/files/unsorted/mspgcc/compiler.h
> >
> >I think it would be a good idea to add it to mspgcc because it would
> force TI
> >to do the C examples compiler independent.
> >I used the current version with mspgcc and crossworks.
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >Rolf
> >
> >
> >
> >-------------------------------------------------------
> >This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> >Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads,
discussions,
> >and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
> >_______________________________________________
> >Mspgcc-users mailing list
> >Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users
> >
> >
> >


Reply via email to