On 2006-03-19, Steve Underwood <ste...@coppice.org> wrote: >>Are you sure you don't get any warning?? If so, I may switch >>to gcc 3.3. I'm using 3.2, since that's the latest "released" >>version from mspgcc.sourceforge.net. > > I would recommend not using 3.3. We use 3.2 for a good reason. It works > better. A number of things done in 3.3 and 3.4 benefit x86 compilation, > but seem to hurt compilation for other processors.
That's too bad. >>It looks like they're at 3.3.2. I must admit I'm pretty baffled >>by the statement at cdk4msp.sourceforge.net that says: >> >> CDK4MSP is based on the GCC toolchain for the Texas >> Intruments MSP430 MCUs maintained by Dimitry Diky and Chris >> Lichti at Sourceforge (http://mspgcc.sourceforge.net/). Til >> now MSPGCC supports Win32 developer systems as best as >> possible. There is no really good Linux support. >> >>What do they mean? The files I downloaded from >>mspgcc.sourceforge.net worked fine under Linux. Have they >>(cdk4msp) done something besides build RPMs? > > I have no idea what that means. However, if you follow the steps in the > manual, installation on most Linux systems is very straightforward. It certainly worked fine for me, but I've been building gcc cross-compilers for many years, so maybe I've forotten how baffling the process can be the first time. -- Grant Edwards gra...@visi.com
