On 2006-03-20, Stokes, Mark <msto...@idexcorp.com> wrote:
> I don't use these type switches (I use show me all warnings,
> but I realize that warnings are just that, warnings).
So each time you compile, you have to read through the warnings
and manually sort out the 'normal' ones from the ones that you
need to fix?
> Since I don't use them, I didn't know if they existed or not.
> Sounds like you have proposed to have such a switch.
Not really, I just disabled that warning permanently.
> Either way. Another solution could be to have the serial
> handler IRQ throw another IRQ when certain conditions warrant
> them. Then have that IRQ handler be set to wakeup.
That would work, but I don't think I have any enough spare
interrupt vectors. I'd need one extra vector for each of the
two UARTs.
> I am not trying to say the way you are doing it is wrong, or
> anything like that, I'm just trying to come up with
> alternatives. You didn't fully describe what you were doing
> in the first message,
I guess I should have said that I needed to wake up
conditionally in my original posting.
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! As a FAD follower,
at my BEVERAGE choices are
visi.com rich and fulfilling!
