How about using Integration's ML7065 it has a complete 802.15.4 MAC
implementation where as my understanding is that Airbee and Ember if using
the CC2420 (or EM2420) have implemented part of the MAC layer into their
software stack on the micro which does have an impact on code/data space
available. I do not know what footprint does the Airbee implementation
carries and what are your application's requirements. So, get the part with
most ram/flash, the F13x and F14x family are possible candidates.

 

Making something custom is entirely your choice but If you are only looking
for a module which gives you zigbee connectivity then Telegesis's ETRX1 or
ETRX2 which are based on AVR/CC2420/EM250 and Ember zigbee stack and comes
with two serial ports and number of I/O pins in a convenient form factor can
also be used to provide your application zigbee compatibility. It will save
you the hassle of doing 2.4GHz RF design. 

 

Regards,

Shoaib

 

  _____  

From: mspgcc-users-ad...@lists.sourceforge.net
[mailto:mspgcc-users-ad...@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Steve Franks
Sent: 20 April 2006 18:47
To: mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Mspgcc-users] Thoughts on ZigBee?

 

Hi all,

I'm switching my tooling from AVR to MSP.  I'd like to make some CC2420
ZigBee/MSP modules (think AirBee-light MSP430 demo), and I'm wondering which
MSP variant folks would suggest.

Design criteria, in order of importance: 

* Small (QFN package)
* 1.8V operation
* SPI (obviously, for CC2420)
* Uart, 38.4k operation w/o crystal preferred
* >4 GPIO's
* I2C
* Adc

Also, what solution is suggested for flash programming & debug (can be two
items)? Usb prefered, 802.3 ok too?  Has MSP standardized on a connector and
pinout for prog/debug?

Anybody want to buy a couple boards when I do a run?  I'm planning a 24-pin
extra-wide (0.9") DIP format so we can stick it into proto boards directly,
and a carrier with some screw-terminals, gpio buffers, some solid-state
relays . 

Thanks for the info!
Steve

Reply via email to