On 2007-07-08, Neil Wyper <[email protected]> wrote: > I tried this quickly, and any level of optimization other than > -O0 eliminated the pushes and pops. I've found -O2 is usually > the best choice, often creating code that is smaller than -Os.
That's what I've seen as well. For the projects I've done, -O2
always produces smaller code that -Os.
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! I'm in a twist
at contest!! I'm in a
visi.com bathtub! It's on Mars!! I'm
in tip-top condition!
