Hi. I'd like to have access to the hardware multiplier, so it would be great if I could get copies of your patches. They don't seem to be the same ones as what is checked into cvs. Can you post them here so that everybody gets a copy?
Thank you very much. On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:14:47 +0200 [email protected] wrote: > Hi Dima, > > [email protected] wrote on 19.06.2008 > 08:50:21: > > : > > First off, disabling the hardware multiplier does stop the > > crashing! Do you know why that is? Also, don't I need the hardware > > multiplier? Does > : > > The implementation of HW multiplication is one of my favour suspects > if there are compilation problems with mspgcc. Unfortunately I have > not enough time to dig deeper into this problem. > > : > > disabling it force multiplication to be done via software? > : > > Disabling HW multiplication of course leads to SW emulation of the > multiplication. If you are doing a lot of muliplications and/or > access to arrays/structures there will be a loss of performance. > > > Second, I'm very intrigued that the build works for you. My compile > > options are exactly as I said, with very little of interest. If I > > try to build again, with your exact command, even, I get the crash: > > I've built mine in February 2008. Additionally I've applied some > patches, namely 01_disable-ffunction-section_warning.patch, > 02_fdata-sections.patch, 03_FUNCTION-warning-disable.patch and > 04_gcc-3.2.3-msp430x24x-msp430x26x.patch. > My build script is based on the one from Grant Edwards. But I really > don't know, which of my patches made the mspgcc compile your code... > > Let me hear, if you are interested in my scripts/patch files. > > Hardy
