Sergey,
Isn't it possible to use the already existing 'section' attribute? That
would be more consistent since you are putting variables in a kind of
different memory region. It would also keep code portable to other platforms.
Nico Coesel
At 11:45 25-1-2009 +0200, you wrote:
>Hello everyone
>
> I'm working on >64K support in mspgcc now. I think I could commit my
results into repository next
>week. I decided to place functions and constants into upper memory via
__attribute__ (and I did it,
>it works). I need your help in choosing the name of this attribute. Which
is the best? :
>
>__attribute__((__uppermem__))
>__attribute__((__far__))
>__attribute__((__highmem__))
>
>Or, maybe, other one?
>
>Usage:
>__attribute__((__uppermem__)) cons char * UpperText = "Hello";
>__attribute__((__uppermem__)) void TestFunc(void)
>{
> for(;;);
>}
>
>--
>Regards,
> Sergey A. Borshch mailto: [email protected]
> SB ELDI ltd. Riga, Latvia
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
>This SF.net email is sponsored by:
>SourcForge Community
>SourceForge wants to tell your story.
>http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
>_______________________________________________
>Mspgcc-users mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users
>
>
