Hi Sergey, I've started this
http://apps.sourceforge.net/mediawiki/mspgcc/index.php?title=AddingNewDevice As a start, needs more work, then some plan to start fixing things. I though the msp430-libc/crtxxx.o mess has always been that way, maybe we can come up with a better way. Regards, Peter Jansen ----- Original Message ---- > From: Sergey A. Borshch <[email protected]> > To: GCC for MSP430 - http://mspgcc.sf.net <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, 3 April, 2009 8:32:37 PM > Subject: Re: [Mspgcc-users] changes of the memory mapping for family x5xx > > Peter Jansen wrote: > > No this to Sergey, I never understood why gcrt0.S was compiled for each > processor as it contains no code, > > yes symbols are defined in different places, but that's the job of the > > linker > to sort out. > Because it was compiled for each processor so when I come into project :) > > Let's discuss. > -- > Regards, > Sergey A. Borshch mailto: [email protected] > SB ELDI ltd. Riga, Latvia > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Mspgcc-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users Enjoy a better web experience. Upgrade to the new Internet Explorer 8 optimised for Yahoo!7. Get it now.
