2009/4/9 JMGross <msp...@grossibaer.de>: > > > > > ----- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ----- > Von: Roberto Padovani > An: GCC for MSP430 - http://mspgcc.sf.net > Gesendet am: 08 Apr 2009 21:59:50 > Betreff: Re: [Mspgcc-users] watchdog definitions in wdt_a.h > >> Thanks for reporting the version, it gave me the chance to understand >> what happened: those changes were committed into the MAIN and NOT into >> the MSP430X branch. > >> Is it me that I am missing something or should these changes be >> applied also, and especially, to the MSP430X ? >> Are there any other fixes for the newer MCUs that are in the MAIN only ? > > There was another header file I fixed and which has been added to the main > branch at the same occasion. > (There were some '0' shifted by value instead of value shifted by 0. I'm not > sure about the file name) > Also, I dimly remember some wrong interrupt vectors (or a wrong vector table > base address, depends on viewpoint) mentioned some time ago. > > Maybe these changes should indeed be merged into the 430X branch. > Since it is not very likely that someone will use these devices without the > X-tensions ( or the 430X branch without these devices ) the changes are more > important there than in the main branch. >
The other file is sys.h. I think that these definition files should be the same independently from the cpu architecture, but I don't know if CVS supports "sharing" between branches. R#
