Hi Przemek,
> > > > Thanks, the fno-inline works and reduces the code. > > The bigger project I have, the code size is about the same. > > > > So, is the new GCC on par with 3.x for code size on most projects? You > suggested previously to keep using 3.x because of that---given the > -fno-inline efficiency, are you confident that it's OK to commit to the > latest GCC? Bascially yes I would start moving to gcc 4.3.4, I have some more testing that needs to be done on the target hardware. Getting more people using it would give more test coverage also. The stumbelling block with the pervious ports to the 4.x series was that the compiler would crash on some code, this is now fixed, and other faults can be fixed as they arrise (if required). Should be merge the port into https://launchpad.net/mspgcc ? we could now plan to merge into the main gcc assuming that the code is all GNU etc? Regards, Peter Jansen __________________________________________________________________________________ Find local businesses and services in your area with Yahoo!7 Local. Get started: http://local.yahoo.com.au
