Am 27.07.2011 23:07, schrieb Peter Bigot: > As I get back into doing something useful (i.e., maintain/evolve mspgcc), > I'm proposing the following release process to help ensure stability while > promoting innovation and decreasing maintenance overhead: > > Certain releases of mspgcc will be marked as "Long Term Support". These > releases include well-tested sets of patches against specific versions of > upstream packages like gcc and binutils. The maintenance promise for LTS > releases is that reproducible "significant" bugs for which a > non-disruptive fixes can be identified will be fixed and patches supplied > which can be applied on top of the patches provided in the corresponding > mspgcc release.
... > Downstream packagers should publish only LTS releases, and should Looks useful, thanks a lot. -- M. Andree ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Got Input? Slashdot Needs You. Take our quick survey online. Come on, we don't ask for help often. Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek. http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey _______________________________________________ Mspgcc-users mailing list Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users
