On 14/08/11 12:39, Sergey A. Borshch wrote:
> On 09.08.2011 10:12, David Brown wrote:
>> On 09/08/11 08:01, Sergey A. Borshch wrote:
>>> On 07.08.2011 14:37, David Brown wrote:
>>>>
>>>> If LTO is working, you should consider --gc-sections and related flags
>>>> as deprecated.
>>>>
>>> Until you want to use C++
>>>
>>
>> What do you mean by that?  Another of the big benefits of LTO is that it
>> works with C++ (and indeed any other language supported by gcc).  With C
>> only, you could use "-fcombine -fwhole-program" (which gives smaller and
>> better code than --gc-sections, but requires you to compile all the C
>> code in one lump).  But "-fcombine" only works for C - LTO works for C++
>> too.
> Sorry, you are right. I jumble LTO and "-fcombine" which works with C only.
>

Originally, -fcombine was going to support different languages (or at 
least C and C++), but I think as work progressed on LTO it was not worth 
bothering with -fcombine.



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FREE DOWNLOAD - uberSVN with Social Coding for Subversion.
Subversion made easy with a complete admin console. Easy 
to use, easy to manage, easy to install, easy to extend. 
Get a Free download of the new open ALM Subversion platform now.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Mspgcc-users mailing list
Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users

Reply via email to