Peter Bigot scrisse: > New LTS/20110716 patches have been posted.
I've been on vacation lately, so I'm catching up with your LTS-plus- patches right now. For some packages (eg. binutils) I'm forced to refresh your patches against FSF's binutils cvs trunk, as the maintainer is actively tracking it, so I can't directly use your patch-files :(. IMHO It would be useful, at least to me, if you please would stick tags on different LTS patchlevel. Something along the line of the list below... *** Example on branch LTS/20110716 of binutils: (git-tag -> git-commit) lts-20110716 -> 8b3b41a69905eeab5e723129f5fd7e5761f28309 lts-20110716p1 -> 7e144e8efaa78433e2f9288c2ce8e0de40ce763c lts-20110716p2 -> 7e144e8efaa78433e2f9288c2ce8e0de40ce763c *** This would help having a more consistent naming, even when packagers are forced to use newer FSF's sources (as you have already seen with gcc 4.5.3). Moreover, your quoted mail was lacking SF-3379341 among binutils patches, but README correctly lists it. Cheers, Luca -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Luca Bruno (kaeso) : :' : The Universal O.S. | lucab (AT) debian.org `. `'` | GPG Key ID: 3BFB9FB3 `- http://www.debian.org | Debian GNU/Linux Developer ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ uberSVN's rich system and user administration capabilities and model configuration take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. Learn more about uberSVN and get a free download at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Mspgcc-users mailing list Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users
