On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 13:51 -0600, Peter Bigot wrote:
> FWIW, 20120911 is essentially solid, and I have no intentions to make
> changes to it. The reasons it's not officially LTS are influenced by
> lack of time and motivation on my part. I'd be more likely to fix
> such a problem in that release, though the bar for fixes even there is
> pretty high now that mspgcc is being superseded by the RH/TI upstream
> effort.
Hi Peter,
Thanks for the detailed explanation! It makes perfect sense.
Does 20120911 still support generating 16-bit code? I know the gcc 4.7
branch adds support for 20-bit addresses, but I have no idea if I can
choose what kind of code to produce (or in other words if it's backwards
compatible).
Thanks,
Radu
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial
Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support
Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services
Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d
_______________________________________________
Mspgcc-users mailing list
Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users
