Hello,
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 17:45:00 -0500
Peter Bigot <big...@acm.org> wrote:
> C++ is not supported by mspgcc. Some people are using it to some
> degree with some success, and may be able to provide hints about
> improved compatibility, but no effort has been made to ensure it
> functions.
C++ as a language works really well with mspgcc. Well, C++ is big and
multi-paradigm, the part which is good for embedded works well (that
includes compile-time meta-programming and excludes run-time
cycle-burning, like virtual functions).
Well, it sucks that things like:
=========
struct Timer
{
const static int irq_no = 10;
};
interrupt(Timer::irq_no) irq_handler()
{
}
=========
don't work, but I put up with that.
C++ stdlib is different story. I recently did a survey of MCU C++ libs
and found it funny that almost everyone (including me) had circular.hpp
or similar in their codebase. So, good-for-embedded things of STL (like,
well, template classes) are definitely a miss and people reinvent the
wheel. https://github.com/vancegroup/stlport-avr may be a good start to
get those.
>
> It is to be hoped this will be addressed by Red Hat's version.
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Thomas Taranowski
> <t...@baringforge.com>wrote:
>
> > mspg++ seems to be functioning, but all the standard c++ includes
> > seen to be missing. For example, cstdio, cstdlib, etc. Am I
> > missing some part of the install, or is this work yet to be done?
> >
> > -Tom
--
Best regards,
Paul mailto:pmis...@gmail.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Mspgcc-users mailing list
Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users
