On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Ilya Dmitrichenko <errordevelo...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> On 23 September 2013 12:15, Peter Bigot <big...@acm.org> wrote:
> > That output looks like an mspgcc build before I took over and replaced
> the
> > hard-coded genericized MCU list with the full set of MCUs.
> Specifically, it
> > looks possibly like an msp430x branch mspgcc.
> >
> > Dunno if msp430 gcc happened to follow that practice: I truly hope it
> > didn't.
>
> I have built binutils from binutils master branch found in
> git://sourceware.org/git/binutils.git
> with HEAD being e1926926db.
>
OK. I'd forgotten that back in 2003 or so part of mspgcc got pushed
upstream into binutils and that it would look roughly like what you've
shown.
I have no idea how you're supposed to specify the target characteristics in
msp430 gcc. DJ or somebody from TI will have to answer.
Peter
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint
2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes
Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Mspgcc-users mailing list
Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users
