On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 2:55 PM, DJ Delorie <d...@redhat.com> wrote: >> file systems, and I want to re-use the standard libc interface at >> the application layer. > > Could you elaborate on this? Are you talking about real hardware > talking to real peripherals, or is there a host involved?
I'd already outlined my expectations in the earlier thread; see for example http://www.mail-archive.com/mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg12038.html. If the msp430 version supplies a weak definition of _write() (not write()) that goes through CIO, we're good because I can replace it with one that delegates to a descriptor-specific implementation. If the definitions aren't weak, we're probably not good. I'll hold off on further comment until I have an opportunity to see what actually needs to be done to make this work. I expect something that allows me to do for the msp430 what I did for ARM as described at: http://pabigot.github.io/bspacm/newlib.html#newlib_sys Peter ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, this first edition is now available. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/NeoTech _______________________________________________ Mspgcc-users mailing list Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users
