and while we are on the subject, make sure to checkout these
- CM12 in a Lab -The CM12 BitLocker FrontEnd HTA - video<http://www.windows-noob.com/forums/index.php?/topic/7636-the-cm12-bitlocker-frontend-hta-video/> - CM12 in a Lab - The CM12 BitLocker FrontEnd HTA<http://www.windows-noob.com/forums/index.php?/topic/7294-the-cm12-bitlocker-frontend-hta> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Marcum, John <[email protected]> wrote: > Personally I’m not a fan of the self service portal. I didn’t install > it. If a user is locked out I can’t make them go to another machine to get > their own recovery key. Seems silly. > > > > Also you should be aware of the short retention of historical data when > using MBAM 2.0 and CM integration. Due to that I opted for a hybrid > install. I did a VERY brief blog about that which I intend to expand upon > soon. > > > > I’d say BL is the easiest to manage however it does not meet all > compliance regulations. There’s one in particular it cannot meet. I don’t > recall which one. Sorry. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jason Sandys > *Sent:* Monday, June 17, 2013 10:18 PM > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* RE: [mssms] RE: Disk Encryption > > > > MBAM 2.0 has user self-service portal also. > > > > Bitlocker is very reliable. > > > > Suits shouldn’t make technical decisions – case in point. > > > > J > > > > *From:* [email protected] [ > mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *chris catlett > *Sent:* Monday, June 17, 2013 7:45 PM > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [mssms] RE: Disk Encryption > > > > Look at MBAM 2.0 (offers sccm 2012 integration). > > It’s a nice management client/console for bitlocker. > > > > Lets you dole out access to helpdesk for recovery keys. > > > > *From:* [email protected] [ > mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Kevin Johnston > *Sent:* Monday, June 17, 2013 10:32 PM > > *To:* '[email protected]' > *Subject:* [mssms] RE: Disk Encryption > > > > Actually we do have SA. It just took them this long to realize that they > need to encrypt data. We currently use WDS/MDT to do our images. > > I never understood why they went with Win 7 Pro and not enterprise on the > machines (done before my time). Mistakes made by the past affect the future > right J > > > > But if going to Ent is a possible solution (only currently encrypting > laptops) then they may still decide to do that. > > > > I figured bitlocker would be a suggestion, I just don’t know how reliable > and manageable it is. Also it is possible we will be going to Win 8 at some > point too (I don’t make any decisions, I don’t wear a suit) > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [ > mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Jason Sandys > *Sent:* Monday, June 17, 2013 9:37 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [mssms] RE: Disk Encryption > > > > Good luck with that. The only full-disk encryption that plays well with > OSD and MDT is … surprise, Bitlocker – which of course your org cannot use > because (being blunt here) your org was too cheap to actually buy SA and is > now ending up paying even more in the long run because it saved them money > in the short run. Sorry, more of rant not direct at you personally, just to > short-sighted (worthless) MBAs. > > > > J > > > > *From:* [email protected] [ > mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Kevin Johnston > *Sent:* Monday, June 17, 2013 4:36 PM > *To:* '[email protected]' > *Subject:* [mssms] Disk Encryption > > > > Was wondering if anyone deploys disk encryption along with their > deployments? > > > > We are looking into this, and just getting a feel for some of the players. > Needs to be manageable and I would like to see something that is easy to > deploy, maybe something that allows us to encrypt after an image (I guess > kinda like bitlocker) but I am not sure how powerful it is. Our machines > are solely Windows 7 Pro x64 machines. > > > > Anyone have any recommendations or suggestions? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Kevin Johnston > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be > protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have > received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to > this e-mail and then delete it from your computer. > > ------------------------------ > > Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be > protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have > received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to > this e-mail and then delete it from your computer. > >
