My suggestion is that OS refresh be done in person on those type of systems, or swapped out with a freshly reimaged system if you don’t want to be standing in the store for a while waiting for the reimage. SCCM will have no issues with managing the systems, it will just suck up your bandwidth as you allow it. Personally, we use 1E Nomad on those types of systems so that patches and whatever can be deployed to them without affecting performance of the end user. If you don’t use 1E Nomad, you might consider setting the BITS throttling on the systems to a reasonably low level to prevent patching from affecting performance of the network link for your app.
Rick J. Jones Wireless from AT&T Domestic Desktop Application Management D: (425) 288-6240 C: (206) 419-1104 From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Danny Guillory Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 2:27 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: Low Bandwidth WAN ok, well I got some kiosk on 14.4 k (over 6k using 3g are less) so I’m trying to come up with a bandwidth recommendation LTE could be a option, but not all kiosk are in a LTE locations. Being on that slow of connection some are most features of CM are irrelevant (like OS refresh's, etc.) and you can also forget about patching that workstation, also if on 3g there's only so much data that can go without running into being charged Per-GB Danny G. Guillory Jr., MCP | Sr. Consultant, Infrastructure, SE Phone: 337-303-6453 Office: 713-239-8383 Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> www.avanade.com<http://www.avanade.com> From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 2:59 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> I would say LTE is more of a “high-latency” connection, than a “low-bandwidth” connection. Christopher Catlett Consultant | Detroit Office 248-876-9738 |Fax 877.406.9647 Sogeti USA 26957 Northwestern Highway, Suite 130, Southfield, MI 48033-8456 www.us.sogeti.com<http://www.us.sogeti.com/> From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dzikowski, Michael Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 3:52 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [mssms] RE: Low Bandwidth WAN Is this an IBCM or Direct Access scenario? Or do you have a full site connected via 3g, 4g, LTE? Are these cell phones / mobile device management? What kind of clients? What kind of issues are you seeing, having, etc.? From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Danny Guillory Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 3:44 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [mssms] Low Bandwidth WAN Anyone have experience with clients being on the end of a low bandwidth wan (3g/4g/LTE) Danny G. Guillory Jr., MCP | Sr. Consultant, Infrastructure, SE Phone: 337-303-6453 Office: 713-239-8383 Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> www.avanade.com<http://www.avanade.com/> [Description: logo-AVA-footer] Stay Connected: [Description: cid:[email protected]] <http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/pages/Avanade-Inc-Careers/33035116568?ref=ts> | [Description: cid:[email protected]] <http://twitter.com/AvanadeJobs> | [Description: cid:[email protected]] <http://www.youtube.com/user/AvanadeInc> I [Description: cid:[email protected]] <http://www.linkedin.com/companies/avanade>
<<inline: image001.gif>>
<<inline: image002.gif>>
<<inline: image003.gif>>
<<inline: image004.gif>>
<<inline: image005.jpg>>
