All of them. Direct Access is a network connectivity solution that operates below ConfigMgr. ConfigMgr doesn't know anything about it just like it doesn't know anything about a VPN or a router for that matter. It sends traffic, the enwtrok delivers the traffic.
J From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of JRIT Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 12:37 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [mssms] Using VeriSign certs for IBCM Ok, but what feature from SCCM is supported in a client on the internet using Direct Access? 2013/7/31 Jeff Krueger <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> DA is not on the radar at this time, would be nice to have... With IBCM I think each client requires a unique cert? So using a public CA could be problematic for anything more than a few clients? Somebody please correct me if I'm wrong On Jul 31, 2013, at 1:21 PM, "Garth Jones" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Have you looked at Direct Access? This might be a better option. From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeff Krueger Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 1:07 PM To: SCCM List MyItFourm Subject: [mssms] Using VeriSign certs for IBCM Does anyone have any experience with using VeriSign (or other public CA) certs for their internet based clients? Gathering my facts now for implementing IBCM with 2012. Unsure of relying on our PKI so looking at the possiblity of using VeriSign certs. Looking for pros/cons and whether this is a supported method.
