I don't think so, we had a PFE on site a few weeks ago and that is what we 
determined to be the issue. We are evaluating upgrading to CU2 now. :)

Ill check with our admins to see if I am mistaken, but I believe Microsoft told 
us CU2 would fix it.

Daniel Ratliff

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Ryan
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 4:35 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [mssms] Odd OSD issue with driver packages and content distribution

We are on CU2...

Do you know if there is any information documenting this issue? I don't see 
anything in the CU2 patch notes.

On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Daniel Ratliff 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Known issue pre-CU2. The temp fix is to distribute your packages to all your 
DPs. Have to have 100% compliance before the TS will work.

Daniel Ratliff

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] 
On Behalf Of Ryan
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 3:45 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [mssms] Odd OSD issue with driver packages and content distribution

Yesterday, we finished setting up a new DP and added it to a DP Group so it 
could start getting content. Right after we did this, OSD stopped working and 
gave errors about not being able to find driver content. The error code was:

Failed to find CCM_SoftwareDistribution object for AdvertID="XXXXXX", 
PackageID="XXXXXX", ProgramID="*"

The DP it's pulling content from is not the new DP according to the smsts log.  
Our OSD guys disabled that driver package, and re-ran the task sequence.  It 
failed again, same error but different driver package ID.  This content exists 
on the DP it is trying to run from, and an hour before the task sequence worked.

Our running theory is that if the content of a driver package is in progress 
somewhere in the world, OSD task sequences referencing it will not work until 
the content was successfully transferred.

Has anyone else seen something like this?  Have we read the situation wrong and 
something else is happening? I haven't been able to find anything through 
Google, so I'm not so sure we read this right.


The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed
and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information 
in error,
please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.




The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed
and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material.  If you receive this 
material/information in error,
please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.


Reply via email to