I've never tried the registry values, but there are command-line switches to 
rc.exe in 2007 that tell rc.exe which site server (sms provider actually as 
these are almost always assumed to be the same) to use to check permissions and 
send auditing info. Just run rc.exe at the command-line. I *think* the same is 
true for 2012 but from memory it was slightly different.

J

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Kim Oppalfens
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 7:34 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [mssms] ConfigMgr 2012 SP1 Console Connection Limit

Rc.exe actually does deliver auditing even in ConfigMgr 2007.
The requirement for this to work is that the AdminUI has to be installed on the 
machine running rc.exe.
Note that there is no requirement for RC.exe to be launched from that same 
admin ui.

My educated guess is that the reason for this is that the adminui saves the 
siteserver and sitecode you connect to in the registry.

IIRC, it actually saves it here, 
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\SMS\Identification.
And here: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\ConfigMgr10
So you might get away with just importing those registry keys, and keep on 
working with rc.exe

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: 18 September 2013 19:54
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [mssms] ConfigMgr 2012 SP1 Console Connection Limit

I "think" there's a way to audit even if you are not launching the session from 
the console but I am not sure. I seem to recall reading a blog about how to do 
that once.

I don't think that there is a limit on concurrent sessions but I would not 
suggest deploying that many consoles. Keeping them updated is a total 
nightmare. Put it in Citrix instead.

Better yet, use something like WebEx or Lync. We just bought Bomgar which seems 
pretty cool but would likely be expensive for that many users.





________________________________
John Marcum
Sr. Desktop Architect
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
________________________________

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Eric Morrison
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 12:46 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [mssms] ConfigMgr 2012 SP1 Console Connection Limit

Hello Everyone,

I'm currently at a client doing a ConfigMgr 2007 to ConfigMgr 2012 SP1 
migration. Currently in their 2007 environment, they use the built-in remote 
control features of ConfigMgr to connect to different machines throughout the 
organization for support scenarios and different testing situations. The way 
they are handling this currently is RC.EXE and the required DLLs sequenced up 
in an App-V package and made available to all users via RAP (Run Advertised 
Programs). The only problem with this, is they can't centrally audit who is 
connecting to what machine, etc.

In 2012, they want to be able to do this, so I suggested setting up RBAC for 
remote tools users and we sequence the new ConfigMgr 2012 SP1 console. They 
like this idea, but then I found out that they have roughly 1,200 different 
people that use the remote tools feature to connect to different machines 
throughout the organization. Apparently the RC.exe workaround will work in 2012 
still, but just in case we decide to allow that many people to use the console 
for remote tools purposes, what is the concurrent connection limit, if any? If 
there is not a hard limit, are there any guidelines to support a large number 
of simultaneous connections with the ConfigMgr console? Even though 1,200 
people may use this feature, only around 30-50 at any given time will probably 
be connected.

Thanks!

Eric Morrison

________________________________

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.

________________________________

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.





Reply via email to