With VMWare's gang scheduling, more CPUs is actually worse. J
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 11:48 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [mssms] RE: sccm virtualize and intergration. As with any virtualization platform. If you don't give the vm the recourses it needs, performance will suck. This includes ram, vcpu's (more is not always better, esp in vmware's implementation.) as well as disk (IOPS are key, not just separate vmdk files on the same physical LUN) Christopher Catlett Consultant | Detroit [MCTS_2013_small] Sogeti USA Office 248-876-9738 |Fax 877.406.9647 26957 Northwestern Highway, Suite 130, Southfield, MI 48033-8456 www.us.sogeti.com<http://www.us.sogeti.com/> From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dzikowski, Michael Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 12:36 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [mssms] RE: sccm virtualize and intergration. 99% of market share? That's funny You certainly can virtualize your site server and roles. But that totally depends on several variables with your site, systems, etc. Microsoft has 100% certified VMware as a virtualization platform. http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg682077.aspx#BKMK_SupConfigVirtualization Mike D- From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Burke, John Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 12:25 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [mssms] sccm virtualize and intergration. I got pulled into a meeting and they stated they are most likely going with the vmware tech. They stated that they have 99% of the market share. Is that true? How well does vmware intergrate with sccm?
<<inline: image001.jpg>>
