Ian,

 

Local SQL is generally much easier to deal with, and can provide better
performance if it's configured correctly.

 

Cheers,

Trevor Sullivan

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Hamilton, Ian A
Sent: Monday, December 2, 2013 10:55 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [mssms] SCCM2012: Local vs Remote SQL

 

Hi,

 

Can anyone point me to an official Microsoft statement on the local vs
remote SQL argument.?

 

I'm arguing SQL should be local as less than 50,000 clients, I need more
than TechNet forum posts and community blogs to back that up though.

 

Any help would be appreciated.

 

Thanks.


**********************************************************************
COMPUTACENTER PLC is registered in England and Wales with the registered
number 03110569. Its registered office is at Hatfield Business Park,
Hatfield Avenue, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9TW
COMPUTACENTER (UK) Limited is registered in England and Wales with the
registered number 01584718. Its registered office is at Hatfield Business
Park, Hatfield Avenue, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9TW
COMPUTACENTER (Mid-Market) Limited is registered in England and Wales with
the registered number 3434654. Its registered office is at Hatfield Business
Park, Hatfield Avenue, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9TW
COMPUTACENTER (FMS) Limited is registered in England and Wales with the
registered number 3798091. Its registered office is at Hatfield Business
Park, Hatfield Avenue, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9TW

The contents of this email are intended for the named addressee only.
It contains information which may be confidential and which may also be
privileged.
Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive mail for the
addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else.
If you receive it in error please notify us immediately and then destroy it.
Computacenter information is available from: http://www.computacenter.com
**********************************************************************

 

 



Reply via email to