Correct.
 
The granularity of RBAC is very good but does not go down as far as the methods 
for populating a collection.
 
There was a good suggestion for deploying a modified SCCM console to those 
users who will be using the SCCM console and this might work for you
 
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 11:14:15 -0500
Subject: Re: [mssms] RBAC, is this possible?
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]

Security Group based collection membership?  I actually love to go that method, 
but this client doesn't want to do that.
It seems the consensus is that one cannot easily prohibit others from modifying 
the queries used in a query based collection.


On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Jason Sandys <[email protected]> wrote:









Why not use AD Security groups for this?
 
J
 


From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Krueger, Jeff

Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2014 8:55 AM

To: [email protected]

Subject: RE: [mssms] RBAC, is this possible?


 

I did this for some of our IT staff, gave them the ability to just add direct 
memberships to a collection and remove devices from a collection.  Had our 
Citrix
 team publish the console and I modified the xml files to take away the 
collection properties from the context menu and force them to just use the add 
resource menu item.
 
Unfortunately with RBAC you have to give the modify right for users to be able 
to add devices to a collection which also includes the ability to create query
 rules, it would be nice to have those rights broken down a bit in future 
updates
 
From:
[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Stephen Owen

Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2014 9:29 AM

To: [email protected]

Subject: Re: [mssms] RBAC, is this possible?

 

We did this in 2007 but in 2012, they're wanting to go all Console.  

 


I think I'll be rolling a PowerShell GUI to help facilitate all of this.


 


Thanks,



 

On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Sherry Kissinger <[email protected]> 
wrote:



Once someone has create or modify on a collection, they can change anything.



I suggest have a "front end" -- either a web page, or a powershell gui 
(something like that) which those regional staff can use; you could keep it 
simple "input computer names here" (and a separate one for usernames), and 
trust they've already confirmed the
 exact computer name and the exact username, or your could get as complex as 
you like on verification--confirming the computer or user exists, confirming 
that the user running the "add a computer" has the correct "rights" to manage 
that particular computer
 or user.



The web page does the actual adding using a service account--which has rights 
to that collection.   Basically, a "roll your own shopping".



You could also look at all the various shopping addons for CM12--that's pretty 
much what you are looking for.

 


Sherry Kissinger

Microsoft MVP - ConfigMgr

[email protected]


 







From: Jason Wallace <[email protected]>


To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>


Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2014 7:32 AM

Subject: Re: [mssms] RBAC, is this possible?




 




I really don’t think that you would be able to do this.


 


http://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/Matrix-of-Role-Based-d6318b96
 is a very useful resource on RBAC, as is Chris Nacker’s blog



 


Sent from Windows Mail


 




From: Stephen Owen


Sent: Wednesday, 8 January 2014 13:27

To: [email protected]



 



Hi all,

 


  My client would like to setup RBAC so that regional IT users are able to add 
individual computers or users to a collection, but not create or modify 
query-based collection membership queries,
 which I will be creating.  


 


  I've not spent a lot of time with RBAC, do you know if this is possible?  


 


Thanks!


 



 

 







 


 

 

 





CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email contains information from the sender that 
may be CONFIDENTIAL, LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, PROPRIETARY or otherwise protected 
from disclosure. This email is intended for use only by the person or entity to 
whom it is addressed. If
 you are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure, copying, 
distribution, printing, or any action taken in reliance on the contents of this 
email, is strictly prohibited. If you received this email in error, please 
contact the sending party by reply
 email, delete the email from your computer system and shred any paper copies.



Note to Patients: There are a number of risks you should consider before using 
e-mail to communicate with us. See our Privacy & Security page on
www.henryford.com for more detailed information as well as information 
concerning MyChart, our new patient portal. If you do not believe that our 
policy gives you the privacy and security protection you need, do not send
 e-mail or Internet communications to us. 
 










                                          


Reply via email to