I've seen a couple of one-off reports of it in the forums but nothing concrete and not personally either.
If you can find a case of this, please, please report it to CSS. J ________________________________ From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Grant, Jeff <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, February 3, 2014 3:49 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [mssms] Has anyone run into Available deployments behaving as if they are Required deployments We have started seeing cases where a software deployment that is configured to be "Available" with the expectation that the end user would select the software and install it at their convenience installs without the end user initiating the installation. We had not seen this happen until after our environment was upgraded to Configuration Manager 2012 SP1 from 2012 RTM. But we have not found any discussion in forums of this being symptomatic of SP1. Has anyone else seen this behavior? Jeff ?? ? I'm not even sure there is such a thing as the Internet. I think it may just be Carl telling everybody stuff.
