Here are problems I remember running into that can cause downloads from DPs to 
go slow....  My details are all sketchy, sorry.

Does your network support IPv6?  If not, do you have it disabled on your 
servers?
If you have IPv6 enabled on your servers and they have registered their IPv6 
address in DNS then WinPE will attempt to connect over IPv6 first and then fall 
back to IPv4.    The timeout is ~30 seconds if I recall. You could check this 
if you open a dos prompt (F8) and ping the DP.  Does it try to do a IPv6 ping.  
Set your servers to not use IPv6 so they DNS won't give out IPv6 addresses.  In 
full Windows, you can set the Registry to prefer IPv4, but I don't think you 
can do that in WinPE.

Another thing I have seen is that with BITS, there was a setting about session 
authentication vs needing to authenticate every file or block.  I don't 
remember all the details of this, but it had something to do with needing to 
send reauthentication hundreds of times to download one package.  There is a 
setting to say to use session based authentication.  Maybe someone else 
remembers this problem?  I only recall vague details.  I am not sure if SCCM 
2012 now sets DPs correctly to get rid of this problem.  This looks like it 
discusses what I mean 
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/benjaminperkins/archive/2011/10/31/kerberos-authpersistnonntlm-authentication-request-based-vs-session-based-authentication.aspx


You could try setting your DPs to "allow clients to connect anonymously" just 
temporarily and see if it helps - that would mean it is some problem with 
credentials like above.  Like it tries Kerberos first and has to timeout to get 
back to NTLMv2 or something... There is a fix for this, but again details are 
foggy.

You might look in the IIS logs of your DPs to see if there are errors or 
anything weird.

Maybe your network guys have seen a lot of traffic to your DPs and throttled 
the connection.  Don't discount the idea that outside forces are conspiring 
against you.  You could be flooding your data center firewall - that is 
especially true with that authentication thing I mentioned above.

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Stephen Owen
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 4:48 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [mssms] After installing slow OSD KB in R2, it is still slow? Did 
I miss something?

Could you recommend any troubleshooting steps or tools to use to try to isolate 
the issue?  Image downloading, MDT Package Download and any data transfer are 
all incredibly slow.

On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Jason Sandys 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

The hotfix only addressed the actual OS image downloading slowly.



Boot images come down via TFTP and the other content comes down via the normal 
content distribution process and BITS.



If you are seeing slow download times on multiple different methods (as you've 
described), you've got other issues.



J

________________________________
From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on 
behalf of Stephen Owen <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2014 11:53 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [mssms] After installing slow OSD KB in R2, it is still slow? Did I 
miss something?

Downloading the WinPE image, downloading the toolkit package, all still taking 
forever to download.  I recreated the WIM after installing the OSD fix, and 
applied it to the CAS and each primary.  Do I need to restart SCCM or WDS or 
anything else?








________________________________
Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the 
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is confidential and 
may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of 
this communication is strictly prohibited.  Please reply to the sender that you 
have received the message in error, then delete it.  Thank you.
________________________________



Reply via email to