At least don't trust vendors with their built-in cmdlets. ;)
In fact I remembered why I wrote a script based on WMI to create a Distribution 
Point 
http://www.david-obrien.net/2013/03/21/how-to-install-new-distribution-point-sccm-2012/
 

-------
David
http://www.david-obrien.net


From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [mssms] Clients ignoring boundaries
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 15:40:11 +0000










PowerShell For the ... loss. Don't let Garth know, he will never let you live 
it down.

 

Well, at least you found it though.

 

J





From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf 
of David O'Brien <[email protected]>

Sent: Friday, February 7, 2014 7:39 AM

To: [email protected]

Subject: RE: [mssms] Clients ignoring boundaries
 


it pains me to say, but it's this: 
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2860244/en-au

I totally forgot about that issue when we implemented the DPs over 8 months 
ago. Now the customer started testing them and found the problem.



-------

David

http://www.david-obrien.net







From: [email protected]

To: [email protected]

Subject: RE: [mssms] Clients ignoring boundaries

Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 13:28:45 +0000





Multiple nics (wired/wireless)…connected to two different subnets?  If so, make 
sure the nic connected to the desired boundary the preferred
 DP(s) connected to, is the only nic that is ENABLED.
 
Is the site/location/subnet behind a Nat’ed firewall, masking/spoofing all the 
client’s IP?
 
Is the Proxy Settings configured in the ConfigMgr control panel applet?
 

Troy L. Martin | Principal Consultant
1E | Empowering Efficient IT
US Mobile: +1 (678) 898-6147
UK Mobile :
+44 782 655 0296
[email protected]
|
www.1e.com
 
Facebook
 | Twitter
 | YouTube
 | Blogs
 | RSS
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

 


From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of David O'Brien

Sent: Friday, February 7, 2014 7:45 AM

To: [email protected]

Subject: [mssms] Clients ignoring boundaries


 

Hi all,



clients in a site are all ignoring the configured boundaries.



1 central DP in biggest location

lots of remote DPs



All boundaries are IP ranges, all boundaries are members of respective Boundary 
Groups and remote DP is assigned to Boundary Group as FAST Site System for 
Content Location.

All DPs have fallback disabled!



Client in remote location now asks MP for content location and MP_Location.log 
shows me this:

adding client's assigned site as FALLBACK



This means that the MP thinks the client is outside of any boundary, still the 
MP tells the client to go to the central DP and get the content.



First: I already tried IP range for that one client, IP Subnet and even AD 
Site, that client is always put into "FALLBACK".


Second: If that would be the case, why is it redirected to the central DP?



The MP seems to work fine. I can create new collections, put machines into 
those, create new Deployments and those machines will get the deployment. So I 
believe I can rule out a misbehaving MP, at least for that part.



Version is 2012 SP1 CU3.



Any idea?



-------

David

http://www.david-obrien.net

 








DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content,
 this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract unless 
pursuant to explicit written agreement or government initiative expressly 
permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.














                                          


Reply via email to