OK, I might have figured out the problem. A little egg on my face here, I probably should have checked this earlier. I deployed the updates to a collection which had a query rule set up based on group membership. For some reason, the collection had not been updating as new members were added to the group even though the schedule said to update once a day. I manually updated the collection and suddenly the machines that should be in that collection magically appeared. So, I’m betting now, IE9 magically appears. Ryan
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael Gouldthorp Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 1:11 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] deploying Internet Explorer 9 through SCCM I had a similar issue deploying IE9 via Software Updates (CM2012). I ended up opening a support case with MS and after a month of troubleshooting the issue it turned out be a problem with a specific Canon print driver (CPC10QW1.EXE in our case). The driver was interfering\disrupting the software update detection method for Internet Explorer 9 (Article: 982861). After installing the following hotfix (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2522422) the software update agent correctly detected that IE9 was missing and we were able to successfully deploy IE9. The other less elegant option was to simply delete the file from the computer (C:\Windows\System32\spool\drivers\x64\3\CPC10*.EXE) and wait for the next Software Update Evaluation Cycle \ Software Update Deployment Cycle to occur. I know it’s a bit of a long shot that you are experiencing this same issue but I figured I should at least throw it out there for you. Good luck! Thanks, Mike From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Ryan Shugart Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 1:28 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] deploying Internet Explorer 9 through SCCM Thanks. I think the language pack is in my deployment. I took a Windows 7 fresh install, had it scan and install updates, and it got IE9 with no issues, so that tells me the prereqs and language pack is out there and deployed properly. I’m starting to wonder if there is an issue with that specific client, they only let me send it to three machines to test, one already had IE9 and the other the user is out of the office and no one wants to reboot it… So… Ryan From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Owen Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 12:23 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com> Subject: Re: [mssms] deploying Internet Explorer 9 through SCCM IE9 requires a language support pack before it can be installed. Make sure you approved and add the language pack to the update deployment for IE9 as well. On Feb 20, 2014 12:04 PM, "Ryan Shugart" <rshug...@mii.com<mailto:rshug...@mii.com>> wrote: Hello all: I’ve been asked to push Internet Explorer 9 out to one of our offices using SCCM. I haven’t pushed an IE upgrade out through SCCM before, normally if the user needs IE upgraded they install the update on their own. I figured the best way to do this was to use software updates and just send the various versions of IE out to a collection of the appropriate computers as an update. Unfortunately, while it installed fine on a test machine I set up, its not installing on the users machines, and I can’t tell why. The update is on the DP, but I don’t think the computers think they need the update. So I’m thinking that’s not the right approach and am looking into just sending it out using software distribution. I looked on Microsoft’s site and found instructions for doing this, I need to download the various IE components and distribute them out and run ie9_package.exe /quiet /norestart /update-no I assume if I take off the /update-no it will go ahead and just install any updates it needs. Question, am I on the right track for the best way to do this? Is there a better way to handle this I’m not thinking of? Thanks. Ryan Ryan Shugart LAN Administrator MiTek USA, MiTek Denver 314-851-7414<tel:314-851-7414> © COPYRIGHT, MITEK HOLDINGS, INC., 2011-2013, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ________________________________ This communication (including any attachments) contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s), please note that any distribution, copying, or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and then destroy any copies of it. © COPYRIGHT, MITEK HOLDINGS, INC., 2011-2013, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ________________________________ This communication (including any attachments) contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s), please note that any distribution, copying, or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and then destroy any copies of it. © COPYRIGHT, MITEK HOLDINGS, INC., 2011-2013, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ________________________________ This communication (including any attachments) contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s), please note that any distribution, copying, or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and then destroy any copies of it.
