http://blogs.msdn.com/b/steverac/archive/2010/02/06/configuring-sccm-and-branch-cache.aspx

This was written for CM 2007 but other than a new Windows 8 GPO setting 
“Configure Client BranchCache Version Support” (which you’ll need to adjust 
from the default for backward compatibility if you’ll have both Win7 and Win8 
clients participate in the peer caching), the process is pretty much identical. 
 You’ll need to make sure you install the BranchCache feature on your DPs as 
checking the “Enable Branchcache Support” checkbox on the DP will not 
automatically install the feature (install feature, then check the enable box).

The only issues I’ve run into so far are:

1)      If a client happens to have a web or web-type app listening on port 80, 
it won’t allow that client’s Branchcache service to start (it can’t bind to 
port 80).  That specific client won’t participate, but tends to be a very rare 
scenario.

2)      If you set the latency value too low (like 0), very large packages 
(2-3+gb) can run into content download issues when deployed to a bunch of 
clients within the same subnet at once.  I recommend either setting something a 
bit higher than 0 depending on your site-site latency, or unchecking the “share 
content” box for those larger packages, or deploy the large ones in a more 
gradual manner.  When a large # of clients on a given subnet start downloading 
a large amount of data from their peers while the same peers are installing 
this same large application, the client with some older SATA I/II’s can become 
a bottleneck.

That said, it’s a great feature with a very easy implementation, providing a 
consistently high amount of network team happiness.

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Corkill, Daniel
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 7:20 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [mssms] Configuring bits throttling

I might look into the branch cache option. Are there any recommended guides for 
configuring this?

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jason Wallace
Sent: Thursday, 14 August 2014 7:03 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [mssms] Configuring bits throttling

Daniel

While considering BITS throttling is a great idea may I ask whether you have 
considered using BranchCache in this scenario?  In this case you would likely 
download the content to a remote office only once or twice and then serve it 
locally.

Another scenario which can work well with updates - sometimes a remote office 
will have a direct Internet connection which is less slow than that which CORP 
supplies. In this environment you can set updated to download direct from WUMU 
while still deploying the catalog through CM

On 14 Aug 2014, at 08:18, "Corkill, Daniel" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I have a number of WAN sites that are on links ranging from 512k to 1.5m; each 
site has a handful of computers and no DPs. When I deploy monthly updates and 
these clients begin downloading them, I’m obviously concerned about effecting 
the links. I’m looking into BITS throttling via custom client settings but I’m 
unsure what I should actually limit the bandwidth to. Does anyone have any 
guidance on how I can determine the fastest speed I can set before I start 
effecting links?

Daniel.




*********************************************************************

This email, including any attachment, is confidential to the intended 
recipient.  It may also be privileged and may be subject to copyright.  If you 
have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and 
delete all copies of the email.  Any confidentiality or privilege is not 
waived.  Neither the Council nor the sender warrant that this email does not 
contain any viruses or other unsolicited items.



This email is an informal Council communication.  The Council only accepts 
responsibility for information sent under official letterhead and duly signed 
by, or on behalf of, the Chief Executive Officer.



Privacy Collection Notice

Logan City Council may collect your personal information, e.g. name, 
residential address, phone number etc, in order to conduct its business and/or 
meet its statutory obligations. The information will only be accessed by 
employees and/or Councillors of Logan City Council for Council business related 
activities only. If your personal information will be passed onto a third 
party, Council will advise you of this disclosure, the purpose of the 
disclosure and reason why. Your information will not be given to any other 
person or agency unless you have given us permission or we are required by law.








*********************************************************************

This email, including any attachment, is confidential to the intended 
recipient.  It may also be privileged and may be subject to copyright.  If you 
have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and 
delete all copies of the email.  Any confidentiality or privilege is not 
waived.  Neither the Council nor the sender warrant that this email does not 
contain any viruses or other unsolicited items.



This email is an informal Council communication.  The Council only accepts 
responsibility for information sent under official letterhead and duly signed 
by, or on behalf of, the Chief Executive Officer.



Privacy Collection Notice

Logan City Council may collect your personal information, e.g. name, 
residential address, phone number etc, in order to conduct its business and/or 
meet its statutory obligations. The information will only be accessed by 
employees and/or Councillors of Logan City Council for Council business related 
activities only. If your personal information will be passed onto a third 
party, Council will advise you of this disclosure, the purpose of the 
disclosure and reason why. Your information will not be given to any other 
person or agency unless you have given us permission or we are required by law.





Reply via email to