Also, each primary and secondary site supports up to 250 distribution points. If you have a lot of DPs, then you may want to consider adding Secondary Sites instead of more Primary sites.
Jerry -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Eswar Koneti Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 5:01 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [mssms] Secondary Site vs Remote DP Raphael had explained it nicely when to use secondary and remote dp. Have a look at it. http://myitforum.com/myitforumwp/2013/10/16/secondary-site-or-remote-distribution-point/ And http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/e79e3f4d-0518-467c-8d7f-81cbb964b6c7/secondary-site-vs-distribution-point Eswar Koneti www.eskonr.com Sent from mobile device, excuse any typo's as a result. --- Original Message --- From: "Robert Marshall" <[email protected]> Sent: August 25, 2014 2:44 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [mssms] Secondary Site vs Remote DP You'd usually put a Secondary on the other side of a slow link so as to limit impact to said link, and to bound devices to control their communications. Note that you'll need to expect communications to go from the devices back to the Primary Site servers MP's for registration so a route back needs to be opened. Kent called out some use-cases here: http://blog.coretech.dk/kea/installing-a-secondary-site-in-system-center-201 2-configuration-manager/ -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brian McDonald Sent: 25 August 2014 05:11 To: [email protected] Subject: [mssms] Secondary Site vs Remote DP Hey all, Looking for some general guidance or rule of thumb for when to use a Secondary Site vs Remote DP. Any input would be appreciated! Thanks, Brian Sent from my iPhone
