Thanks so much, this is great.  This makes it so that I can continue to do 
things “the wrong way” – a huge relief.

I ended up making  a subselect element in the collection query like

SMS_R_System.ResourceId in (select ResourceID from SMS_CM_RES_COLL_XXX00NNN)

It is a little ugly, but it works – which is probably for the best.  It will 
make it so that I only use it when I really need to. ☺

My collection is something like Computer has “some software” installed, and 
version is less than “current version”, and computer is in “limiter collection”


From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Ryan
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 11:10 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [mssms] Question about Limiting Collections

An include collection query would look like this:

Select * From SMS_CM_Res_Coll_COLLECTIONID
That should grab all computers in the collection

On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Miller, Todd 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Maintenance windows shift the schedule of deployment to be client dependent, 
where my current workflow puts the schedule on the package and advertisement.  
I am not sure I can operate with the time the software gets installed to be 
dependent on the settings on the client.


Thanks for the suggestion on the collection query.  I will investigate to see 
if I can make collection membership of another collection be part of the 
criteria in a collection query.  Do you happen to know off hand what attribute 
class contains collection memberships?   I can’t find it.

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] 
On Behalf Of Ryan
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 9:40 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [mssms] Question about Limiting Collections

Why aren't you using maintenance windows to schedule deployments? That's what 
they are there for.
In my experience, collection refresh schedules only really apply to queries. 
Include and Exclude collection rules happen immediately when one collection 
changes. If you want your old system to work still, use a query rule to add all 
computers in Collection X to Collection Y instead of an include rule.

On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Miller, Todd 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I have a question about the function of limiting collections.  In SCCM 2012, 
they are having a undesirable effect where when a limiting collection is 
changed, the collections that are limited by that collection seem to reevaluate 
immediately.   I have a workflow in 2007 that this new function disrupts.    
Sorry this is kind of long.


Here is my workflow in SCCM 2007.

I create a collection with query rules to determine what clients are eligible 
for the installation.  This collection we will call “Deploy  - App A” and I set 
the collection to refresh daily at 3:30AM.  I create another collection named 
“Limiter –App A” which is initially empty.  The Deploy - App A collection is 
set to be limited by Limiter –App A.

Then I advertise an package to deploy to “Deploy – App A” and set it to run at 
some time in the past- I could also set it to run “as soon as possible.”  
Nothing happens immediately because Deploy – App A and Limiter – App A are 
empty.

Now when I want to deploy Application A to a client, I add Computer X to the 
Limiter – App A collection.  At 3:30AM (and not before), when the Deploy –App A 
 collection is refreshed, the client is added to Deploy – App A and the next 
time the client checks in AFTER 3:30AM, the software is installed.

Basically, I can drop clients or lists of clients into the Limiter collection 
in the middle of the day knowing that they won’t get added to the actual 
deployment collection until the collection is scheduled to refresh in the 
middle of the night.

That’s how this functions in SCCM 2007.


SCCM 2013 messes up this beautiful arrangement I have.  Now the deployment 
collection ignores the collection schedule entirely.  I am not even sure what 
that collection refresh schedule is good for anymore.

As soon as I add a client to Limiter – App A, the Deploy – App A collection 
seems to refresh and Computer X that I just added to Limiter – App A gets added 
to Deploy – App A.  Since the advertisement is in the past, itkicks off the 
installation.  My ability to pre-stage installations during the day knowing the 
deployment collection won’t update until the middle of the night is lost.  I do 
not have the Deployment collection set to do incremental updates, so why is it 
not respecting the collection update frequency?

Is there a way to predictably (at a particular time)  add clients to a 
collection where I could stage them during the day and have the collection 
update at a set time?  There doesn’t seem to be a way for me to ensure that 
collections are updated only on a strict schedule anymore.


________________________________
Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the 
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is confidential and 
may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of 
this communication is strictly prohibited.  Please reply to the sender that you 
have received the message in error, then delete it.  Thank you.
________________________________




________________________________
Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the 
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is confidential and 
may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of 
this communication is strictly prohibited.  Please reply to the sender that you 
have received the message in error, then delete it.  Thank you.
________________________________





________________________________
Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the 
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is confidential and 
may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of 
this communication is strictly prohibited.  Please reply to the sender that you 
have received the message in error, then delete it.  Thank you.
________________________________

Reply via email to