I’m curious to hear from those that have App-V and/or Citrix XenApp if they 
find themselves still deploying the Office suite and other mainline LOB 
applications (SAP, IBM Notes/Outlook, etc) as a local install of if 
App-V/XenApp has allowed them to keep the local installs to an absolute minimum.


That description of an “in-place” upgrade of Office 2010 to 2013 is what we 
term a rip-and-replace; an in-place upgrade would be one where an uninstall 
wasn’t first performed. 


It seems to becoming more common for us to have to follow complex 
rip-and-replace scripts for applications (simply applying an upgrade to IBM 
Notes is a real PITA). In 2015 there’s a chance we may gain access to Citrix 
XenApp and App-V and I’m wondering just how much its realistic to assume we can 
eliminate the local installs for some of these core applications.





From: Phil Wilcock
Sent: ‎Tuesday‎, ‎December‎ ‎30‎, ‎2014 ‎4‎:‎38‎ ‎PM
To: [email protected]






Hmm, be great if the user could just carry on working while their machine was 
being upgraded, eh Junior? J 

 



From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Andreas Hammarskjöld
Sent: 30 December 2014 18:17
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: [ConfigMgrMVPs] Blogpost: Is Intune going to re place 
Configuration Manager?

 

Yeah, it was more of a fact that it takes so long that nobody does it, it’s 
quicker to blast the machine and put a new image down.

 

//A

 



From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Hanley, Kevin
Sent: den 30 december 2014 18:56
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: [ConfigMgrMVPs] Blogpost: Is Intune going to re place 
Configuration Manager?

 

We did an in-place upgrade of Office 2010 to Office 2013 using SCCM:

 

 

1.       Communicate/Schedule with users for groups of 50-100 per night (remove 
anyone who opts out from collection)

a.       Instruct laptop users to leave machines in office powered on

2.       Scheduled installs for 8pm (to avoid anyone who is working late and to 
ensure machines have not gone to sleep)

3.       Cancelled deployments if hadn’t kicked off by 4am (to avoid bad 
morning for end user and help desk)

4.       Cached files for Office 2013 (and also Visio and Project 2013 as 
necessary)

5.       Deployed front-end that gave user a 5 min countdown:

a.       Defer for 60 mins

b.      Defer for 10 mins

c.       Run Now

d.      Cancel and Reschedule for later

6.       If User chooses to Run Now (or no user present)

a.       Reboot

b.      Run Office 2010 uninstall

c.       Reboot

d.      Run Office 2013 install

e.      Reboot

7.       Send log file from client along the way to a network share to allow 
monitoring of status (cancelled/deferred/uninstallphase/installphase/errors)

 

We used hklm\system\setup\cmdline keys to run the uninstall/install similar to 
a Windows Update or Mini-Setup before the user can login (to avoid them 
relaunching Office apps and interfering with install:

https://social.technet.microsoft.com/forums/windows/en-US/b942a34d-c4a7-489c-bb01-45dd65fa9b20/setuptype-and-cmdline-at-hkeylocalmachinesystemsetup

 

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Todd Hemsell
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 12:02 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: [ConfigMgrMVPs] Blogpost: Is Intune going to re place 
Configuration Manager?

 


precache office then install.


 


On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Andreas Hammarskjöld 
<[email protected]> wrote:




So who in here has ever done an in place upgrade of Office? Rebuilt of image is 
always quicker…? Or am I wrong?

 

//A

 



From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Kim Oppalfens
Sent: den 29 december 2014 22:33
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: [ConfigMgrMVPs] Blogpost: Is Intune going to re place 
Configuration Manager?

 

Downside of beta’s, people already make up their mind.

Even if it’s just sentiment, you don’t switch people over from one way of doing 
things to another overnight.

The quickest thing our industry embraced was server virtualization and even 
that took multiple releases, and multiple years before it became the mainstream 
way of implementing servers in production.

 



From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 9:56 PM
To: SMS
Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: [ConfigMgrMVPs] Blogpost: Is Intune going to re place 
Configuration Manager?

 



People tend to forget that Windows 10 is actually still beta and not even close 
to being finished.


 



From: Marable, Mike
Sent: ‎Monday‎, ‎December‎ ‎29‎, ‎2014 ‎3‎:‎47‎ ‎PM
To: SMS


 



“Windows 10 will change OS and software deployment…”

 

I’m sorry but I’d have to beg to differ.  So far I have had little luck with 
using the in-place upgrade that Microsoft is pushing in the real world.  To be 
honest I’m finding it just as problematic as it was in prior versions of 
Windows.  We may be “old school” on this but when the time comes to migrate 
from Windows 7 to Windows 10, as it stands right now we’re going to do it the 
same way we went from XP to Windows 7; using wipe and load task sequences run 
from SCCM.

 

I would love for all of this to just work and for us to be able to use it.  But 
in healthcare change happens very slowly.  Everything has to have a proven 
track record before we will let patient safety rely on it.

 

 

 



From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 3:34 PM
To: SMS
Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: [ConfigMgrMVPs] Blogpost: Is Intune going to re place 
Configuration Manager?

 



Or… just roll out the pieces Kim believes are missing. Intune is a full Azure 
service now which means any new feature can be rolled out anytime and can take 
advantage of Azure power.  Windows 10 will change OS and software deployment, 
btw, so take those off the list. 


 


 


 



From: Ed Aldrich
Sent: ‎Monday‎, ‎December‎ ‎29‎, ‎2014 ‎3‎:‎30‎ ‎PM
To: SMS


 



I’m betting that the Redmond crowd will be dissecting THAT post for some time 
trying to figure out how to respond to it in some fashion, somewhere!!!

 

Wow!

 


Ed Aldrich | Solutions Engineer

1E | Empowering Efficient IT

Mobile: (401) 924-2293

[email protected] | www.1e.com

 Description: Description: cid:[email protected]  Ent Cli Mgmt 
(2003-2014)

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

 



From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Kim Oppalfens
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 2:40 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: [mssms] [ConfigMgrMVPs] Blogpost: Is Intune going to replace 
Configuration Manager?

 

Hi All,

 

I’ve expressed these views a couple of times already to colleague mvp’s and 
people interested in hearing my opinion.

It tends to be fragmented in talks though, so I decided to put my thoughts into 
writing, and dedicate a blog post to it.

So this is a shameless plug for that blogpost:

http://bit.ly/1vn7hGu

 

Now, discuss J

 

 


Met vriendelijke groet / Kind regards,


Kim Oppalfens | Managing Consultant & MVP| OSCC

 OSCCD32aR00aP02ZL  cid:[email protected] 

(  +32 16 60 91 43
È +32 475 86 98 35

* [email protected]

 

 


 

 

 







Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or 
calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any 
attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, 
disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly 
prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will 
operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.


 

 

**********************************************************
Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be 
used for urgent or sensitive issues 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
computer.

Bain Capital, LLC
Boston, MA  USA
+1 (617) 516 2000

Reply via email to