Hes not the guy who started the thread. :) Daniel Ratliff
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Andreas Hammarskjöld Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2015 10:16 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [mssms] BranchCache & WS-D Does that mean you solved it? What was wrong? From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Robert Schlichting Sent: den 8 januari 2015 16:13 To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: RE: [mssms] BranchCache & WS-D My apologies to the forum, please disregard.. From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Robert Schlichting Sent: Thursday, January 8, 2015 8:01 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: RE: [mssms] BranchCache & WS-D We have a mix of cisco switches, from 2950 to 37xx varieties. Use cat5/6 cable from switch to endpoint, and want ability for fiber between switches. From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Andreas Hammarskjöld Sent: Thursday, January 8, 2015 5:18 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: RE: [mssms] BranchCache & WS-D What hardware are you on switchwise? From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jason Wallace Sent: den 8 januari 2015 12:07 To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [mssms] BranchCache & WS-D Hello folks Have a funny little issue on a customer site and was hoping that someone with more networking skills than I could help out please. So, when a client want to access content it goes to the content server. Content server returns a list of hashes. Client issues WS-D probes to see if content is already on peers. These probes go out via multicast which is cool. Now this customer has IGMP snooping turned on which is grabbing these packets and the suppressing them. Disabling snooping of course allows clients to work on branch cache. The whole point of snooping however is to stop IGMP from flooding the network so I don't want to be in a position of suggesting that this is turned off. This leads therefore to my asking whether there is a suggested configuration for switches in this way? Jason The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information in error, please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.
