I've tried to accomplish the same thing. In the end I have create 2 computer 
collections.
1 is based on the installed application with the old version installed.
1 is based on the application with the new version installed. So as long as 
your hardware inventory is regularly (daily). Then you can deploy the updated 
application to the computer collection.  The computers should move from one 
collection to another.

I did need to put the supercedance in place.
An additional user deployment to a user collection is in place for when a user 
installs the application from the software catalog.

So the user doesn't need to be logged in for the deployment to take place.

I also noticed in the appdiscovery.log that the application targeted at the 
user didn't appeared to be discovered.

From: Roland Janus [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 09 January 2015 16:24
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [mssms] Upgrade (supersedence) user based deployment

Bump?


From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Roland Janus
Sent: Mittwoch, 7. Januar 2015 14:22
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [mssms] Upgrade (supersedence) user based deployment

Not sure if I'm thinking about this right.

I want all applications basically targeted to "all users" as available to shop.
The user installs the application.
Now a new version is created and superseded.

If the deployment is "available" it would upgrade all clients where it is 
installed if the user is logged on.
But what if I want all clients having the old version be upgraded, regardless 
if someone is logged on?
Obviously "required" on "all users" isn't a choice.

Can I only do that through device targeting (inventory with old version) or is 
there a choice to make this required for the users having this application?
CM seems to know about those, but I have no idea if a user based collection can 
have the same data:

[cid:[email protected]]

The right number is "users with application"

Can a user collection have that data? I didn't notice anything obvious in the 
query editor.

-Roland




_____________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System on behalf
of Leeds College of Building.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
_____________________________________________________________________


_____________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System on behalf
of Leeds College of Building.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
_____________________________________________________________________


Reply via email to