yes it will install on next software updates deployment evaluation cycle From: sccmfun Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 11:18 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [mssms] 2 reboots - MS15-009?
Hmm, I need to test that maybe I wasn’t patient enough. Can anyone else confirm that if a reboot is needed and more patches still need to be installed that it will install the next round? We are using maintenance windows. If that is the case, that would be great. From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mote, Todd Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 4:43 PM To: '[email protected]' Subject: RE: [mssms] 2 reboots - MS15-009? No, it was all the same deployment. If you’re using maintenance windows, if there’s enough time left in the window for the next update it should install and reboot again. I’d have to go look, but I’m pretty sure that’s how it happened here. From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of sccmfun Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 3:36 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [mssms] 2 reboots - MS15-009? So you had to do 2 separate deployments? SCCM isn’t smart enough to install 3012952, reboot, do the scan and then patch again and install 3034196 right? If I want both patches to be installed during the same patch window, I would need to do 2 deployments is what it sounds like? From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mote, Todd Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 4:20 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [mssms] 2 reboots - MS15-009? Not if 4196 isn’t detected unless/until 1952 is installed. 4196 seems to be dependent on 1952. That was true here as well. Todd From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of sccmfun Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 3:06 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [mssms] 2 reboots - MS15-009? MS15-009 has 2 KB’s with it: · 3021952 · 3034196 We have deployed both to Windows 2012 servers, and what happens is SCCM sees that 3021952 is needed, it patches the machine and reboots. It then comes back up does another scan and see that’s 3034196 is needed. Is anyone else seeing this behavior? In order to get the machine fully patches, it looks like I need to deploy the SUG that includes both patches twice. The 1st time it kicks off it installs the 1st patch, and I target the SUG again a 2nd time it runs and will install the 2nd patch. Is that expected behavior? Shouldn’t both patches have been installed at the same time? Thanks
