yep. That's the down side. Except where I also had All DP's assigned. Then
I was OK. Or make a new DP just like the old and assign it first. Just a
thought.

Dave


On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Sean Pomeroy <[email protected]>
wrote:

> If you remove the DP group from a package, won't it start to remove the
> content from all those DPs?
>
> On Tue Feb 17 2015 at 2:16:26 PM Ryan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Someone could probably script that...
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:21 PM, David Jones <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> No I definitely don't want to edit the database without MS helping but I
>>> just found a way to get it fixed. It will be labor intensive but doable.
>>>
>>> Look in Database views for v_DPGroupMembers. Find a server, DPNALPath,
>>>  that is in your DP group and determine the DP GroupID from that. If the
>>> server is in more than one DP Group then you will have to count the
>>> instances of the GroupID to find the one with the right number of servers
>>> for the DP Group you are interested in. All of my DP's are in 2 Groups, All
>>> DP's and DP's of the agency that the server is located in. So one will have
>>> far more instances of GroupID than the other.
>>>
>>> Take that GroupID and find the view v_DPGroupContentDetails. Right
>>> click the view and choose Select Top 1000 Rows. After the last line of
>>> query at the top add:  where GroupID =
>>> '{AAAAAAAA-BBBB-CCCC-DDDD-EEEEEEEEEEEE}'  . Use single quotes and keep the
>>> {} brackets.
>>>
>>> In the result I am finding something like this:
>>>
>>> There are 19 servers in this DP group. Note that some packages show 20
>>> or 21 servers and have a stuck status of In Progress or Error. I am going
>>> to each package, removing the DP Group, waiting a few minutes and then
>>> putting it back. So far so good. And I am doing NO editing of the
>>> database.  This will take a few days.
>>>
>>> [image: Inline image 2]
>>>
>>> Dave
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:45 PM, elsalvoz <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>> +1
>>>>
>>>> True/false on status all the time. Don't trust them as your environment
>>>> health view for distribution.
>>>>
>>>> Cesar
>>>> On Feb 17, 2015 8:52 AM, "Nash Pherson" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>  I think the best thing to do in these scenarios is open a support
>>>>> case with Microsoft. There are a bunch of bugs in those health status 
>>>>> views
>>>>> which require going into the database to clean up records.  (And the more
>>>>> of us that call and open tickets, the more likely it is that they will fix
>>>>> the bugs.)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Nash
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
>>>>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *David Jones
>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 17, 2015 8:48 AM
>>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>>> *Subject:* [mssms] "Distribution Point Group Status" in SCCM 2012 R2
>>>>> CU4 Console
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I have spent the past week getting all of the 'Distribution Point
>>>>> Configuration Status' statuses green. Mostly it was ghost packages left
>>>>> over from when SCCM 2012 was upgraded from sp1 to R2. But now they are all
>>>>> Green. They were all real issues at each DP that had to be cleaned from
>>>>> both the WMI and file structure. Luckily there are scripts online and
>>>>> the Content Library Explorer that helped find which ones were the 
>>>>> culprits.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> However, the "Distribution Point Group Status" is another story. Many
>>>>> show either Error or In Progress. When you open the 'View Status', nothing
>>>>> is under In Progress, Error, or Unknown. So I have nothing to go by to 
>>>>> help
>>>>> me figure out what is hanging these group statuses from showing Success.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Has anyone dealt with this before?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Dave
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>


Reply via email to