Justin, that is supported once you are at CB 1602.  This is what we did but
we did run into some IIS issues afterwards that required a call to MSFT.

We will spin up a new server once Server 2016 is RTM and supported by
ConfigMgr CB.

*-----------------------------------------------*

*Adam Juelich*

Pulaski Community School District <http://www.pulaskischools.org>

Client Management Specialist

920-822-6075


On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Justin VanDyke-Restifo <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Same boat.
>
> Initially single Primary Site Server on WS 2008 R2 with ConfigMgr 2012 R2
> CU3. We upgraded to 1511 with in place but want to do 2008r2 to 2012r2 now.
> Is that upgrade supported? I thought I read that it is now.
>
>
>
>
> [image: photo]
> *Justin VanDyke-Restifo*
> Network Architecture Shepherd, Voorheesville CSD
> 518-765-3313 x318 | [email protected] | www.voorheesville.org | 432
> New Salem Rd Voorheesville, NY 12186
> <http://www.linkedin.com/pub/justin-vandyke-restifo/27/74a/3b4>
> <http://plus.google.com/u/0/102151622008698026219/>
> "Welcome to the Redundancy Department. Here is where you will find
> redundant people is what you will find here at the Redundancy Department."
> Get a signature like this: Click here!
> <http://ws-promos.appspot.com/r?rdata=eyJydXJsIjogImh0dHA6Ly93d3cud2lzZXN0YW1wLmNvbS9lbWFpbC1pbnN0YWxsP3dzX25jaWQ9NjcyMjk0MDA4JnV0bV9zb3VyY2U9ZXh0ZW5zaW9uJnV0bV9tZWRpdW09ZW1haWwmdXRtX2NhbXBhaWduPXByb21vXzU3MzI1Njg1NDg3Njk3OTIiLCAiZSI6ICI1NzMyNTY4NTQ4NzY5NzkyIn0=&u=495651665646902>
>
> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Marcum, John <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Personally I am in the middle of a side0by-side migration from 1602 to
>> 1602 just because my old primary site is on 2008R2.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Freddy Grande
>> *Sent:* Thursday, May 12, 2016 7:52 PM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] Best upgrade path ?
>>
>>
>>
>> We were on a similar boat;
>>
>> Initially single Primary Site Server on WS 2008 R2 with ConfigMgr 2012 R2
>> CU3
>>
>> 1.       Upgraded in place to ConfigMgr 1511
>>
>> a.       Our plan was to upgrade that to 1602 but for some reason no
>> matter what we did it never showed up on the console
>>
>> 2.       Built new WS 2012 R2 with ConfigMgr 1511 > upgraded to 1602
>>
>> 3.       Migrated pretty much everything from old server to new server
>> (1511 to 1602 migration)
>>
>> 4.       Had issues with DPs and we still seem to be having some weird
>> cryptic issues
>>
>> a.       Application Deployments with following errors: “CI Version Info
>> timed out” or “CI documents download timed out”
>>
>> b.       Site server deploys client to itself but it never reports to
>> the actual site
>>
>> c.       Errors showing in Site Status for Application Catalog web
>> service point and Application Catalog website point but no relevant errors
>> in logs
>>
>>
>>
>> If I could do it again I would bring up a new server without migrating
>> anything and configuring it from scratch. We are small enough that we can
>> actually do this but didn’t expect these many issues from a migration.
>>
>>
>>
>> You should note as well you can’t “install 1602” from scratch. You must
>> install 1511 first and upgrade to it.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Freddy
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] [
>> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>]
>> On Behalf Of Richard Bjerregaard
>> Sent: Friday, 13 May 2016 6:49 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [mssms] Best upgrade path ?
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> So 1 vote for in-place upgrade of OS followed by in-place upgrade of SCCM
>>
>>
>>
>> Would anyone
>>
>>
>>
>> 1) Build a new server with W2K12R2, install SCCM R2 CU3, restore DB and
>> Data
>>
>>    from backup of old server, in-place upgrade SCCM to 1602.
>>
>> 2) Build a new server with W2K12R2, install SCCM 1602, manuel
>>
>>    "rebuilt" configuration. Perhaps restore selected data from
>>
>>    backup.
>>
>> 3) Build a new server with W2K12R2, install SCCM 1602, start from
>>
>>    scratch with a new configuration, applications and TS.
>>
>>
>>
>> How will my clients reacts to all this?
>>
>>
>>
>> rg
>>
>> Richard
>>
>>
>>
>> 12. maj 2016, 20:24:07, you wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > I'm never a fan of in-place upgrading an OS, especially on a server.
>>
>> > Having said that I'd do an R revision in-place then upgrade CM in-place.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>>
>> > From: [email protected]
>>
>> > [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>]
>> On Behalf Of Richard
>>
>> > Bjerregaard
>>
>> > Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 5:10 PM
>>
>> > To: [email protected]
>>
>> > Subject: [mssms] Best upgrade path ?
>>
>>
>>
>> > Hi everyone
>>
>>
>>
>> >   Looking for some guidance, high level steps.
>>
>>
>>
>> >   Have
>>
>> >   SCCM 2012 R2 CU3 running on Windows Server 2012 RTM
>>
>> >   4.500 clients, all windows 7, ~200 applications.
>>
>> >   Just 1 server. Physical.
>>
>>
>>
>> >   How can I get(upgrade) to SCCM 1602 on Windows Server 2012 R2 ?
>>
>> >   I can properly wait until Server 2016 is released, if that makes a
>>
>> >   difference.
>>
>>
>>
>> >   Preparing for Windows 10.
>>
>>
>>
>> > rg
>>
>> > Richard
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > ________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> > Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be
>>
>> > protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you
>>
>> > have received this message in error, please notify the sender by
>>
>> > replying to this e-mail and then delete it from your computer.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> NOTICE: This email is confidential. If you are not the nominated
>> recipient, please immediately delete this email, destroy all copies and
>> inform the sender. Australian Maritime Systems Ltd. (AMS) prohibits the
>> unauthorised copying or distribution of this email. This email does not
>> necessarily express the views of AMS. AMS does not warrant nor guarantee
>> that this email communication is free from errors, virus, interception or
>> interference.
>> ------------------------------
>>
>>
>> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be
>> protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have
>> received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to
>> this e-mail and then delete it from your computer.
>>
>>
>
>

-- 

------------------------------
The Pulaski Community School District does not discriminate on the basis of 
any characteristic protected under State or Federal law.



Reply via email to