Well, we just had our typical monthly DRS case with Microsoft last week, and are more than eager to never have one again after next month.
Daniel Ratliff From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Robert Spinelli Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 3:30 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: Current Branch - Safe to go all virtual servers? You’re going to SCCM CB and collapsing to one primary? I’m jealous. I’m assuming you hated replication and how colleval worked in general when you had a CAS? Thanks Rob From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 2:26 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [mssms] RE: Current Branch - Safe to go all virtual servers? Been running all virtual since about 2011. 72k clients, CAS + 3 Primaries. So happy to be moving to a single site in a couple weeks! Daniel Ratliff From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Burke, John Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 1:13 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [mssms] Current Branch - Safe to go all virtual servers? Hi folks, We got a little push back against going physical and perhaps my thinking is out of date. In the past we have gotten burned by I/O on virtual servers when we had a primary virtual server. Would you folks say it’s ok to have virtual servers for primary and secondary sites now a days? The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information in error, please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information. The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information in error, please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.
