Think I recall somewhere on the Twitterverse an issue affecting a small number of people who went direct from v1511 to v1606. Not sure of the details, how widespread, or if it has been resolved. Shane From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 06:22:02 -0500 Subject: [mssms] RE: Upgrading from 2012 R2 SP1 to 1602/1606
It took a few days for 1606 to show up on my site… 1600 was there within a couple hours of installing 1511 Jimmy Martin (901) 227-8209 From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2016 2:34 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [mssms] RE: Upgrading from 2012 R2 SP1 to 1602/1606 1st step – 1 day.2nd – skip 1602, go to 1606. J From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 6:09 PM To: '[email protected]' <[email protected]> Subject: [mssms] Upgrading from 2012 R2 SP1 to 1602/1606 I have a pretty solid upgrade path, but wanted to know how long you guys would recommend staying at each level before moving on? Now: 2012 R2 SP11st step: 1511 – stay here how long?2nd step: 1602 – Stay here long time, or move on to 1606? Joe HeatonInformation Technology Operations BranchData and Technology DivisionCA Department of Fish and Wildlife1700 9th Street, 3rd FloorSacramento, CA 95811Desk: (916) 323-1284 Every Californian should conserve water. Find out how at:SaveOurWater.com · Drought.CA.gov This message and any files transmitted with it may contain legally privileged, confidential, or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are not permitted to use, copy, or forward it, in whole or in part without the express consent of the sender. Please notify the sender of the error by reply email, disregard the foregoing messages, and delete it immediately. P Please consider the environment before printing this email...
