Less work for them. Here is the fix, use it or not. Even if it breaks other things. We will no longer put in the extra effort to fix our security flaws, instead we will put the burden on you to make sure 100% of everything you have is compatible with these updates.
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Ed Aldrich <[email protected]> wrote: > How do you see this approach being driven as a profit-making process? > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:listsadmin@lists. > myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Todd Hemsell > *Sent:* Tuesday, August 16, 2016 12:20 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [mssms] Microsoft set to change Windows patching in a > disasterous way > > > > Hey, it makes MS more profitable, that is all that matters,. > > > > Same with the forced advertising in a corporate OS you pay millions for > > Same as with the cloud > > Same as with everything > > > > Screw you, suck it up. lol > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Murray, Mike <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I’ve been told “get used to it” on the patch management list. Not good > enough. I think this is ridiculous. > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:listsadmin@lists. > myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Roland Janus > *Sent:* Monday, August 15, 2016 4:08 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* AW: [mssms] Microsoft set to change Windows patching in a > disasterous way > > > > 1+ > > > > If they include such updates, like 3170455 which we also excluded, that’s > certainly going the mess up things.. > > > > *Von:* [email protected] [mailto:listsadmin@lists. > myitforum.com <[email protected]>] *Im Auftrag von *Miller, > Todd > *Gesendet:* Montag, 15. August 2016 22:42 > *An:* [email protected] > *Betreff:* [mssms] Microsoft set to change Windows patching in a > disasterous way > > > > https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/windowsitpro/2016/08/15/further- > simplifying-servicing-model-for-windows-7-and-windows-8-1/ > > > > Wow, this could be a disaster. > > > > We have had 4 or 5 cases in the last 12 months where we have had to delay > the installation of a security update so that applications could be > modified to work with updates. In a couple of cases, one ongoing, > Microsoft has released a security update, then acknowledged a bug in that > update and released a fix several months later. We currently have > KB3170455 denied in our environment because it breaks point – and –print > driver installation. In the new world, I will need to decide which is > worse – no security updates for 3 months, or break printing for all > non-admin users. Currently I can decide to pull or hold an individual > patch, but it looks like that option is being removed from Windows 7 and > 8. This comes at a time where it seems like patch quality has hit a > rough patch, making this decision more troubling. > > > ------------------------------ > > Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by > the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521 and is > intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is > addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, > and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the > intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this > communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete or > destroy all copies of the original message and attachments thereto. Email > sent to or from UI Health Care may be retained as required by law or > regulation. Thank you. > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is > addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this > message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this > email or calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This > email and any attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The > unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or printing of any information it > contains is strictly prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are > those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. > Nothing in this email will operate to bind 1E to any order or other > contract. > >
