Depends what you want to do. You can do most things with the free BranchCache offering that we host. But if you want to do PXE booting over HTTP with BranchCache that will cost you. Same with if you want to control the bandwidth in a better way.
But I would say give BC a try without spending any dime and see what works well and what doesn't. //A From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Murray, Mike Sent: den 25 augusti 2016 17:08 To: [email protected] Subject: [mssms] RE: Current Branch Planning - 400 slow connected stores If you do end up considering 1E Nomad, it worked great for us when we had some slow connections. From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Burke, John Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 7:34 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [mssms] Current Branch Planning - 400 slow connected stores Hi Folks, I'm wondering what folks think about branch cache for dealing with these poorly connected locations. They apparently get massive packages that need to go in 1 night of 20 GB. There are about 1500 systems at these locations in total. I was going to look into 1e nomad, but wondering if I could get away with branch cache. Thoughts? FYI - currently they get a drive mailed to them and copy it manually to 1 system then they either manually do it, or copy it 1 by 1.
