When it was added? It’s been there as long as I can remember. They are saying that because there’s a good chance you could end up with overlapping boundaries if an IP is in an AD site and specified elsewhere as a boundary too. Personally I love ad sites for boundaries but I never use them because I don’t trust the AD guys to keep them up to date.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Burke, John Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 2:39 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] AD Sites and Services for Boundaries.. [External Email] Hi Folks, Back when this became a feature I thought it ws the best thing since sliced bread because of the dumbed down way you can add networks to sites and services VS proper network id’s… During our planning session, Microsoft told us they recommend not using a mix of sites and services, and ip. I know we use IP Ranges for vpn and so on. Are you folks finding Sites and services is not working well because of how consolidated DC’s are now a days, and everyone uses ip ranges for the added control? ________________________________ Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then delete it from your computer.
