for us, squishy-ness comes in if one counts "offline" boxes as failures or not. There's some lines of business that want to count them as non-compliant for whatever it is they are sending to them; so they fall into the "failure" bucket.
If that's how you "count failures", then 90-95% is about right. If that's not how they count failures--it's only for the boxes which are actually online and able to communicate--then it's closer to 97 or 98%. On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Daniel Ratliff <[email protected]> wrote: > 95% for packages, applications, and software updates. 99% for Compliance > Items. > > > > *Daniel Ratliff* > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:listsadmin@lists. > myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Heavner, Charlie > *Sent:* Friday, September 30, 2016 2:38 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [mssms] CM12 industry standard Deployment success rate > > > > Hi Folks, > > > > …long time no post > > > > Anyways, does anybody know if there are any metrics around SCCM Deployment > success rates? > > > > I’ve been at this game a long time and I’m having trouble convincing some > higher ups that the success rate for a Package/Application deployment is a > squishy thing. > > > > 95% > > 90% > > 75% > > > > What’s generally recognized as acceptable success rate? > > > > What say ye’? > > Charlie > > > > The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to > which it is addressed > and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this > material/information in error, > please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information. > > -- Thank you, Sherry Kissinger My Parameters: Standardize. Simplify. Automate Blogs: http://www.mofmaster.com, http://mnscug.org/blogs/sherry-kissinger, http://www.smguru.org
