See if there's reasoning behind mixing it. If you know there's no possible way a computer can fall outside of your IP ranges, why also do AD Sites?
If you don't control the IP Addresses and think there might be a time where a computer falls outside of an IP range and AD Site would pick that up, then you should mix it up. On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 8:05 AM Marcum, John <[email protected]> wrote: > The main reason I don’t use AD Sites is because I don’t control them so I > don’t know that they are accurate. Other than that they work well. > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Burke, John > *Sent:* Monday, November 28, 2016 7:52 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [mssms] SCCM Best Practice around Boundaries? > > > > *[External Email]* > > Hi Folks, > > > > We are still moving towards current branch and in the past we have used a > mix for boundaries of AD Sites and IP Ranges (mostly for VPN slow networks). > > > > It’s been mentioned that you should mix both and we are considering moving > away from using AD Sites and I’m a bit confused as to why we wouldn’t want > to keep using it for it’s simplicity AND mix it with IP ranges. > > > > > > Thoughts or opinions? > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be > protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have > received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to > this e-mail and then delete it from your computer. > >
