Thanks, everyone!  I'll give this a whirl and check evaluation time.  We
are a small environment so the impact may not be that great.

On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Daniel Ratliff <[email protected]> wrote:

> Makes sense. Thanks for the explanations!
>
>
>
> *Daniel Ratliff*
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:listsadmin@lists.
> myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Jason Sandys
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 4, 2017 7:19 PM
>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] Query machines without a number
>
>
>
> Yes, you’re right. There’s no other way to attack it though if the only
> criteria is does contain or does not contain numbers. Definitely will need
> to watch collection eval time. I can think of alternative ways, but they
> involve using a CI or hardware inventory which just adds extra complexity.
> You could change the query to just like and then use an exclusion rule to
> get the opposite – that will help a little.
>
>
>
> J
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:listsadmin@lists.
> myitforum.com <[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Daniel
> Ratliff
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 4, 2017 2:02 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] Query machines without a number
>
>
>
> Isn’t that a bad query regarding performance? Not like and double
> wildcards?
>
>
>
> *Daniel Ratliff*
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:listsadmin@lists.
> myitforum.com <[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Jason
> Sandys
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 04, 2017 2:03 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] Query machines without a number
>
>
>
> This should work:
>
>
>
> SELECT name
>
> FROM SMS_R_System
>
> WHERE name not like ‘%[0123456789]%’
>
>
>
> (replace the smart single quotes above with normal single quotes)
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:listsadmin@lists.
> myitforum.com <[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Daniel
> Ratliff
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 4, 2017 11:19 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] Query machines without a number
>
>
>
> The second use, either use a subselect query of machines with numbers, or
> create a collection of them and use an exclude rule.
>
>
>
> *Daniel Ratliff*
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:listsadmin@lists.
> myitforum.com <[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Adam
> Juelich
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 04, 2017 12:11 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [mssms] Query machines without a number
>
>
>
> Hello Everyone,
>
>
>
> I have a unique scenario here.  The environment I inherited happens to
> have it's AD OU structure laid out in a way where Student/Staff devices are
> not separated.  In order to target Staff machines I could leverage UAC but
> there are some issues and limitations there that I'd like to hold off on.
> Usage assignment won't work when machines are new, having the user choose
> the device can't prevent them from choosing multiple devices (licensing),
> manual assignment would take a long time, and I wouldn't know where to
> start in terms of creating a good CSV to import.
>
>
>
> The only differential variable I can find between Student/Staff machine
> naming is the fact that staff machines have no numbers in them.  Is there a
> way I can do a query based on computer names without a number?  Or should I
> create collections for machines starting with a number and then use those
> as exclusions?
>
>
>
> Maybe I'm overthinking it....
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
>
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
> which it is addressed
> and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this
> material/information in error,
> please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
> which it is addressed
> and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this
> material/information in error,
> please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.
>
>
>
>
>
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
> which it is addressed
> and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this
> material/information in error,
> please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.
>
>



Reply via email to