I would be curious to see whether it is a bug or not. I'm planning and hoping to use the Servicing Method when we start deploying Windows 10.
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Kamerman, Sol <skamer...@babson.edu> wrote: > All: > > > > I decided to go the Task Sequence route to update the system and so far it > has been able to install 1607 upgrade. I am curious as to why it wasn’t > working using the other method. I realized after testing the TS route it > is much better than the other way, but do you think that I should reach out > to Microsoft to see if this is a bug, or is the other method just not > supported and that TS is the better way to go? > > > > Sol > > > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists. > myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Kamerman, Sol > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 7, 2017 12:16 PM > *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com > *Subject:* RE: [mssms] Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker > > > > That’s what I thought. I didn’t think Bitlocker should interfere with > this and that the setup/install process should take care of it. > > > > > > > > > > > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists. > myitforum.com <listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>] *On Behalf Of *Troy Martin > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 7, 2017 12:03 PM > *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com > *Subject:* RE: [mssms] Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker > > > > Regardless of using Feature Update package, Windows 10 Servicing or > In-Place Upgrade…Windows setup/install process will take care of BitLocker > e.g. suspend/(re)enable. > > > > No experience with MBAM. > > > > *Troy L. Martin* | Technical Architect > > *1E | Software Lifecycle Automation for the Digital Business* > > US Mobile: +1 (678) 898-6147 <(678)%20898-6147> | UK Phone : +44 208 326 > 9141 <+44%2020%208326%209141> > > troy.mar...@1e.com | www.1e.com > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.1e.com_&d=BQMFAg&c=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI&r=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4&m=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4&s=lfm9K0cSqM44FHIoBa6p0wzT4MWYkn_0HYGNmWgkATs&e=> > > > > Facebook > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.facebook.com_1eglobal&d=BQMFAg&c=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI&r=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4&m=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4&s=RRWJDZaMGcmivktB58TkvRLoQr1bC6jIDj-MN1oDLlE&e=> > | Twitter > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_1e-5Fglobal_&d=BQMFAg&c=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI&r=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4&m=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4&s=6SY99zYqJ1R5pAavjFi-JmFdxUD0lt-n0XwOK-omJcI&e=> > | YouTube > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.youtube.com_1enews&d=BQMFAg&c=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI&r=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4&m=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4&s=XWjlpxF0vI8J3n42uqWMrEXgHphlWI2PD9XZHOHhX8U&e=> > | Blogs > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__blogs.1e.com_&d=BQMFAg&c=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI&r=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4&m=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4&s=tKrxeysyE64idSmjz1G3NP2ojp9RhRdpv1OljUgTbyg&e=> > | RSS > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__blogs.1e.com_index.php_feed_&d=BQMFAg&c=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI&r=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4&m=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4&s=qGt8-ZGt5rG-J3ClWoppG9TfmFKmktUZprrf0vtNjII&e=> > > > > [image: 1E events banner] <http://info.1e.com/1e-regional-events> > > > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists. > myitforum.com <listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>] *On Behalf Of *Kamerman, > Sol > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 7, 2017 10:38 AM > *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com > *Subject:* RE: [mssms] Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker > > > > So, I should not update the system using the Feature Update software > package with systems that have Bitlocker and do an in-place upgrade using > a task sequence? If I am using MBAM I am assuming this will work the > same, correct? > > > > Sol > > > > > > > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists. > myitforum.com <listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>] *On Behalf Of *Troy Martin > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 7, 2017 10:18 AM > *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com > *Subject:* RE: [mssms] Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker > > > > If doing In-Place Upgrade, Windows will automatically disable/(re)enable > BitLocker during the deployment. > > > > *Troy L. Martin* | Technical Architect > > *1E | Software Lifecycle Automation for the Digital Business* > > US Mobile: +1 (678) 898-6147 <(678)%20898-6147> | UK Phone : +44 208 326 > 9141 <+44%2020%208326%209141> > > troy.mar...@1e.com | www.1e.com > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.1e.com_&d=BQMFAg&c=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI&r=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4&m=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4&s=lfm9K0cSqM44FHIoBa6p0wzT4MWYkn_0HYGNmWgkATs&e=> > > > > Facebook > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.facebook.com_1eglobal&d=BQMFAg&c=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI&r=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4&m=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4&s=RRWJDZaMGcmivktB58TkvRLoQr1bC6jIDj-MN1oDLlE&e=> > | Twitter > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_1e-5Fglobal_&d=BQMFAg&c=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI&r=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4&m=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4&s=6SY99zYqJ1R5pAavjFi-JmFdxUD0lt-n0XwOK-omJcI&e=> > | YouTube > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.youtube.com_1enews&d=BQMFAg&c=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI&r=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4&m=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4&s=XWjlpxF0vI8J3n42uqWMrEXgHphlWI2PD9XZHOHhX8U&e=> > | Blogs > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__blogs.1e.com_&d=BQMFAg&c=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI&r=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4&m=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4&s=tKrxeysyE64idSmjz1G3NP2ojp9RhRdpv1OljUgTbyg&e=> > | RSS > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__blogs.1e.com_index.php_feed_&d=BQMFAg&c=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI&r=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4&m=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4&s=qGt8-ZGt5rG-J3ClWoppG9TfmFKmktUZprrf0vtNjII&e=> > > > > [image: 1E events banner] <http://info.1e.com/1e-regional-events> > > > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists. > myitforum.com <listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>] *On Behalf Of *Kamerman, > Sol > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 7, 2017 8:25 AM > *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com > *Subject:* RE: [mssms] Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker > > > > I believe this log is created if you’re using a Task Sequence to do the > update. I am using the Windows 10 Servicing Feature to update the system. > Will I need to use a TS to update the system to 1607 if I have BL > enabled? Is there another log I can provide to help troubleshoot? > > > > > > > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists. > myitforum.com <listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>] *On Behalf Of *Niall Brady > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 7, 2017 8:09 AM > *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com > *Subject:* Re: [mssms] Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker > > > > the error means > > Element not found. > > Source: Windows > ----- > > but without more info (like your smsts.log) it's hard to guess why it's > saying that, can you attach the log > > > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Kamerman, Sol <skamer...@babson.edu> > wrote: > > All: > > > > Just pinging the group to get some ideas as I am all out. I am trying to > upgrade a laptop that currently has W10 1511, I was able to download the > 1607 Feature Update from my SCCM Server (1606, I haven’t upgraded to latest > Branch but will soon). The test system downloads the file, but when it > tries to install I get an error code 8x80070490. I’ve done a lot of > Googling but nothing has come of it. The only thing that has change with > that the target system is that I have enabled Bitlocker using MBAM 2.5sp1. > Could this be causing the patch to fail the install? I have tried > suspending bitlocker but still the same error. I am trying to avoid > disabling BL all together, but before I do this I thought I would reach out > to the group. > > > > Thanks in advance for any help you can provide. > > > > Sol Kamerman > > Babson College > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is > addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this > message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this > email or calling +44(0) 2083269015 <+44%2020%208326%209015> (UK) or +1 > 866 592 4214 <(866)%20592-4214> (USA). This email and any attachments may > be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, disclosure, > copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly prohibited. > The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not > necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will > operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract. > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is > addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this > message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this > email or calling +44(0) 2083269015 <+44%2020%208326%209015> (UK) or +1 > 866 592 4214 <(866)%20592-4214> (USA). This email and any attachments may > be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, disclosure, > copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly prohibited. > The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not > necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will > operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract. > > > > > >
