> It does, but I suspect VB will refuse to compile if I try to change
> the signature. This is what is so infuriating - if this were a normal
> DLL interface, I could use a BYTE * and a VB Byte()... but since it's
> COM / Automation I'm forced to use a subset of types and they don't
> seem to support anything useful for an array of bytes. You may
> remember me trying an ordinary DLL interface before and finding it
> slow. Hence, trying by OCX instead {:v)Well, have you tried it actually? I have a vague picture in my mind which shows that VB may handle typed arguments better than non-typed ones. Of course I may be wrong, but it's still worth trying even as a last resort. ------------- Ehsan Akhgari Farda Technology (www.farda-tech.com) List Owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] [ WWW: http://www.beginthread.com/Ehsan ] I've done the math enough to know the dangers of a second guessing...
