Hi
> Yes, I do realise that practice will improve how it looks, but just
on a
> purely "first impressions" basis, since it means adding extra words
to a
> normal declaration it can get rather wordy, and the angle brackets,
> especially when nested, are hard to follow (especially since they are
also
> used for less than / greater than, and bit shifts).
Fair enough.
> I actually used a template once, successfully - the code ended up
being
> rewritten in the end without them, but I did get them working - I
actually
> had a good use for it!
That's a good start.
> > How else would you do it? :-)
>
> Call one in InitInstance() and the other in ExitInstance() {:v)
Ah! We're back to MFC I see. :-D
I try not to do MFC you see. :-)
I'd declare an instance of COMInit inside main.
> > I wouldn't do it quite the same way as Ehsan, unless of course the
> > above is a class dcalred and defined local to main?
>
> I assumed it was used as a global object? I must admit I've never
declared
> classes with that extra bit, but doesn't g_init become a global
instance of
> the COMInit class?
Yes.
> There's just so much to the C++ language, so many ways of
> doing things, it's mind-boggling {:v)
It's wonderful!
> ~They're messing with your head Jason, ignore them!~
> *plods off to his VERY basic MFC coding*
Lol!
Regards
Paul
Paul Grenyer
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://www.paulgrenyer.co.uk
Have you met Aeryn: http://www.paulgrenyer.co.uk/aeryn/?
Version 0.3.0 beta now available for download.
